FN0363 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – Northumbria University
|Module Title:||INTERNATIONAL FINANCE AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT|
|Distributed on:||Start of Term|
Hand in Date:
|See UG Office Notice Board|
Instructions on Assessment:
(50% of Marks; 1,800 words)
On 7th of June 2017 Banco Santander (Santander Bank) agreed to buy rival Banco Popular (Popular Bank) for the symbolic price of one Euro. This deal may have come as a surprise to Santander shareholders as just 24 hours earlier European regulators had given over 30 potential suitors the option of buying the highly troubled Banco Popular. Banco Santander’s share price leapt 5% at the release of the takeover news.
“Santander worked through the night, lining up underwriters for a €7bn share issue to fund the deal and securing approval from the US Federal Reserve because Popular has a small business in Florida. Santander was told shortly before 6am on Wednesday that its offer to buy the bank for only €1 had been accepted.
The deal was signed an hour later. A crucial factor in Santander’s bid succeeding was that, unlike rival bidders, it did not ask for any state guarantees against hidden losses lurking inside Popular’s books. One executive who worked on the deal said: “It was one of the nights to remember. I did not sleep at all and just went home a few hours ago to shower.”
Spain’s Santander saves Banco (not so) Popular, Financial Times (2017)
Banco Popular was a very troubled banking institution, with over 37bn euros of highly toxic loans on its balance sheet and rapidly evaporating liquidity as bank depositors started a bank-run on deposits. In an astonishing single night’s work Banco Santander had made the decision to buy the company, about how to fund the acquisition, how much the acquisition would add to their shareholders value and believed they had done sufficient due diligence to protect the interests of their existing shareholders.
In an academic essay format, you are to consider the Banco Santander acquisition of Banco Popular. Financial Times news articles regarding the acquisition can be found below to support students:
You are expected to use this articles and your access to FT resources as the starting point in your wider investigation and research into the deal. You should be using further resources beyond this initial starting point.
Specifically, you are to choose two of the following three tasks (25 marks each) and write a single academic essay that addresses both of the tasks selected.
- You are required to critically evaluate the literature regarding the success or failure of merger and acquisition activity and conclude with an informed judgement as to whether the evidence would suggest that shareholders of Banco Santander should welcome or be wary of M&A activity generally (i.e. for all M&A), and specifically the purchase of Banco Popular. Your answer should specifically include reference to the timescale in which this deal was completed, and address whether or not this should factor into shareholders evaluation.
- You are required to come to a judgement regarding the ability of managers to judge the value of another company when engaging in acquisition activity. Your answer should specifically show an engagement with the academic literature regarding both the efficiency of the stock market and share valuation. Your answer should conclude with an evaluation of the decision by Banco Santander to buy Banco Popular, and conclude whether or not you feel a symbolic single euro valuation was appropriate.
- You are required to critically discuss the impact of cost of capital & capital structure on the ability of companies to generate acceptable returns for shareholders. Your answer should display a thorough and extensive engagement with appropriate academic literature and come to an informed judgement regarding the overall impact of capital structure on the ability to generate wealth. Your answer should specifically examine the Banco Santander acquisition of Banco Popular deal which involved a 7bn Euro rights issue of shares, and the assumption of 37bn Euros of (mostly “toxic”) loans as part of the deal.
(50 Marks Total)
Statement of Learning
(50% of Marks; 1,000 Words + Blog Appendices)
- Students must submit a Statement of Learning of no longer than 1,000 words in length which summarizes their learning experience on the module and their reflections on their module experience. The statement of learning should:
- This statement is to be supported by at least eight appendices which are clearly marked as print outs of the students web-logs (blog’s) on their student experience. The Blog entries should be posted with a time-stamp so it is clearly seen that the students have engaged in a reflective learning experience in a continuous way. The Teaching and Learning Plan for the module has more specific details on the required Blogs.
Students will receive 1 mark for each appendix related to a weekly Blog post submitted (8 marks total). Assessed blog posting should commence by students no later than the end of the 4th week of teaching (Assessed Blog 1) and the last Blog post should be no later than the end of the last week of teaching. Students may (and are encouraged to) submit more than this minimum evidence to support the Statement of Learning.
Appendices should also be clearly marked in the assignment’s contents page with the date and time of when the Blog post was made.
- Students may include more than just their own blog posts and are encouraged to comment and enter into discussions with their fellow students Blogs. These interactions should be printed out and submitted in the assignment appendices. Students are encouraged to interact and reply to blogs and students should make sure that their Blogs are allowing comments.
- Each of the students Blog posts will be marked on their overall depth of reflection on a real world contemporary issue; the depth of ability to critically assess and analyse; and the depth of their ability to reflect on what they are being taught in seminars, lectures and through the directed reading relates to the real world which they are discussing (3 Marks for each blog. Max. 24 Marks for all 8 blogs).
Good Blog posts would be in-depth, considered, and displaying a mature ability to analyse, disseminate and discuss. Poor Blog posts are descriptive in nature and display only a surface appreciation of the issues. There is no minimum length for blog posts, however students are expected to realise that in-depth reflection and developing evidence of critical thinking can take time. It is strongly suggested that students spend at least an hour and a half a week considering and writing their Blog posts. Highlighting exemplars of good blogs from previous students is a key part of the seminar activities related to the Blogging.
- It is advised that students use a free Blog service like Google’s Blogger
(https://www.blogger.com/features ) Students are advised to use the Blogger Youtube channel which has a number of helpful videos on how to improve your blog posts:
Financial Assignments are so hard to complete for most students and in such situations, online assignment help services such as Makemyassignments come to rescue. For Finance Assignment Help, or other assignment help such as Accounting Assignment Help, visit www.makemyassignments.com.